Segway for Ontario (an antithesis)

Segways going up to 12.5 mph should not be mixed with either pedestrians or vehicles approved for use on roadways. The following areas of discussion will be bloged: -personal safety -road safety -sidewalk safety -health considerations "without prejudice" All CCRF, 1982 Sc2(b)

Sunday, August 05, 2001

Epidemic rates of obesity and associated disorders!!

The Segway will no doubt decrease walking and biking, which would be detrimental given the importance of regular physical activity.

• Jeffrey P. Koplan, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and William H. Dietz, with the CDC Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, have noted that epidemic rates of obesity and associated disorders are related to the fact that automobile travel has replaced walking and bicycling for even short trips (October 27, 1999, Journal of the American Medical Association).

# posted by Segway for Ontario @ 12:59 AM

Disclaimer:
The word “segway” has come to mean a whole myriad of “fun” sidewalk toys in todays lexicon. Whether it is a two, three or four wheel --- electrically or gas powered ---“personal assistance vehicle”, “personal mobility device” or whatever --- under the trade name Segway, Embrio, Nolet Electric Cruiser, Rad2Go Electric Chariot --- or colloquially as “ginger”, “ruth” or “fred”, --- they do not belong on the sidewalk. Innovative Mobility does not see these vehicles, regardles of what they may be called, as evil but rather innovative and amazing technology that belong on the roadways and not on public pedestrian pathways where they present a clear and present risk to pedestrians and other City stakeholders. Our mantra is pure and simple to all municipalities and regulating bodies “Please keep the sidewalks safe and do not provide preferential sidewalk access to the wealthy” by allowing them to use the sidewalks as their playground”; “there is simply too many open ended and unanswered questions to allow even limited trials of these sidewalk SUV’s or to approve only for use by persons with disability.”

“without prejudice”
The aforesaid is the opinion of Innovative Mobility based on the best available information available today. As we have said before “Segways are not evil, we believe that they are innovative and phenomenal technology – but they do not belong on the sidewalk or any public trails or pathways used by seniors or children. Redefining the accepted definition of “pedestrian” for the benefit of a single company is outrageously inappropriate.”

Links

• Google News
• Edit-Me
• Edit-Me

archives

• August 2001
• June 2003
• September 2003
• November 2003
• December 2003
• July 2004
• September 2004
• November 2004
• December 2004
• February 2005
• March 2005
• April 2005
• July 2005
• October 2005
• February 2007